Top Notes 
Mandarin orange
Blackcurrant
Pink pepper
Heart Notes 
Rose
Jasmine
Base Notes 
Musk
Vanilla
Patchouli
xtermn8
168 Reviews
xtermn8
1
It's what MK does best. Affordable mediocrity.
Personal: 6/10 - It's wearable, but it's a bit too screechy and sharp. Synthetic.
Mass appeal: 8/10 – Strong white florals aren't for everyone, but it's safe.
Performance: 7/10 – It’s powerful, but doesn't last too long.
Value: 6/10 – Pricing is fine, but this DNA is very dated and overdone.
Uniqueness: 5/10 – Another bold white floral bomb. Done before, done better.
SCORE: 64/100
Full bottle buy? NO, some may love it but it's far from wearable for me.
Blind buy? YES, but beware how loud this fragrance really feels.
Recommend? YES, if you want a bold, statement-making white floral.
Date night? NO, it’s more a throwback to scents of the 2000s than seductive.
Office safe? NO, it’s way too strong and dated for close quarters. Very cloying.
Pros: Bold, strong, loud. A powerhouse of white florals. Not too expensive.
Cons: Screechy tuberose dominates. Patchouli is a bit overwhelming too.
This fragrance is... okay. It's loud white florals with fruity undertones, not done poorly per se, but not done in a way that I particularly enjoy. I don't like smelling this for more than a couple minutes before I get a bit repulsed. Objectively it's fine, I guess, but Chanel is the only brand I've seen do a ladies' perfume with patchouli that I don't find cloying. In men's bottles, patchouli can work very well, but for some reason, this execution in particular isn't for me. Though, objectively, it's just... 'fine'.
Screechy white florals and patchouli come together to create... a headache. Not for me.
Review #70 in my fragrance journey – this fragrance I own as a decant
Mass appeal: 8/10 – Strong white florals aren't for everyone, but it's safe.
Performance: 7/10 – It’s powerful, but doesn't last too long.
Value: 6/10 – Pricing is fine, but this DNA is very dated and overdone.
Uniqueness: 5/10 – Another bold white floral bomb. Done before, done better.
SCORE: 64/100
Full bottle buy? NO, some may love it but it's far from wearable for me.
Blind buy? YES, but beware how loud this fragrance really feels.
Recommend? YES, if you want a bold, statement-making white floral.
Date night? NO, it’s more a throwback to scents of the 2000s than seductive.
Office safe? NO, it’s way too strong and dated for close quarters. Very cloying.
Pros: Bold, strong, loud. A powerhouse of white florals. Not too expensive.
Cons: Screechy tuberose dominates. Patchouli is a bit overwhelming too.
This fragrance is... okay. It's loud white florals with fruity undertones, not done poorly per se, but not done in a way that I particularly enjoy. I don't like smelling this for more than a couple minutes before I get a bit repulsed. Objectively it's fine, I guess, but Chanel is the only brand I've seen do a ladies' perfume with patchouli that I don't find cloying. In men's bottles, patchouli can work very well, but for some reason, this execution in particular isn't for me. Though, objectively, it's just... 'fine'.
Screechy white florals and patchouli come together to create... a headache. Not for me.
Review #70 in my fragrance journey – this fragrance I own as a decant
xtermn8
Acanthea
Gold
Heikeso
pudelbonzo
Maja92
Igli
CandyScent
Borodina
Navimischa
