08/26/2021

Leimbacher
Translated
Show original

Leimbacher
Top Review
32
Baccaraventus
Dua does dupes. You can spin it, cushion it, and explain it however you want, the statement isn't too far-fetched. It doesn't matter if it says "inspired by" or not. High quality, affordable, fabulous and sometimes even superior to its role models, but still dupes. That's why I was rather skeptical of the brand - but then at some point I wanted to take a sniff at the phenomenon and ordered, among other things, "Casino Elixir 2.0", now almost a kind of legend among the "copied perfumes". Because he (or his predecessor) were probably so with the brutal starting signal for the fact that Duo with the fusion (!) Two hit DNAs was now independent enough to take them seriously, to hype and to buy. Even if one can be critical of this "plus+plus=double-plus" scheme. A fragrance like "Casino Elixir 2.0" you still have to put first on the legs.
"Casino Elixir 2.0" takes 70% "Aventus" (rather fruity versions) and mixes it with 30% "Baccarat Rouge 540" - ready is a sublime appearance between high-pitched pineapple and mellow saffron, as you hardly thought possible. The first few minutes are a bit heavy, almost triggering migraines for me if I spray too close or go for it with the plunger. In addition, you can not completely deny a certain synthetic, I would rate the much more expensive paragons qualitatively minimally higher. Or at least they seem a little milder and better blended, more harmonious. But these are only nuances at the price and this penetrating beauty. Dua goes to the limit anyway in terms of performance and potency, which can then quickly seem "too much". A creamy "Aventus". A fruity "Baccarat Rouge 540". Father and mother from the olfactory nobility. Call it what you will. A crowdpleaser full of confidence and sexiness. Overall, "Casino Elixir 2.0" is the most beautiful Frankenstein experiment ever. Sorry, Elsa Lanchester!
Flacon: handy, sticky, capable, pretty is different, though. But's more about the content.
Sillage: filled the entire dance school last Friday
Durability: doesn't stop, even if you have enough - 13 hours
Conclusion: no matter how skeptical you are about Dua, Dupes or the "simple" fusion of two top fragrances - it is quite likely that "Casino Elixir 2.0" will inspire and convince you. Even more so if you love the role models and parent fragrances. It's a classy budget powerhouse of two blockbusters. A little I must deduct in the rating but due to lack of independence. But "laziness" was rarely a finer treat!
"Casino Elixir 2.0" takes 70% "Aventus" (rather fruity versions) and mixes it with 30% "Baccarat Rouge 540" - ready is a sublime appearance between high-pitched pineapple and mellow saffron, as you hardly thought possible. The first few minutes are a bit heavy, almost triggering migraines for me if I spray too close or go for it with the plunger. In addition, you can not completely deny a certain synthetic, I would rate the much more expensive paragons qualitatively minimally higher. Or at least they seem a little milder and better blended, more harmonious. But these are only nuances at the price and this penetrating beauty. Dua goes to the limit anyway in terms of performance and potency, which can then quickly seem "too much". A creamy "Aventus". A fruity "Baccarat Rouge 540". Father and mother from the olfactory nobility. Call it what you will. A crowdpleaser full of confidence and sexiness. Overall, "Casino Elixir 2.0" is the most beautiful Frankenstein experiment ever. Sorry, Elsa Lanchester!
Flacon: handy, sticky, capable, pretty is different, though. But's more about the content.
Sillage: filled the entire dance school last Friday
Durability: doesn't stop, even if you have enough - 13 hours
Conclusion: no matter how skeptical you are about Dua, Dupes or the "simple" fusion of two top fragrances - it is quite likely that "Casino Elixir 2.0" will inspire and convince you. Even more so if you love the role models and parent fragrances. It's a classy budget powerhouse of two blockbusters. A little I must deduct in the rating but due to lack of independence. But "laziness" was rarely a finer treat!
5 Replies